State ex rel. Baker v. Snodgrass

25 P. 1014, 1 Wash. 305, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 64
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 8, 1890
DocketNo. 77
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 P. 1014 (State ex rel. Baker v. Snodgrass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Baker v. Snodgrass, 25 P. 1014, 1 Wash. 305, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 64 (Wash. 1890).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The matter at issue in this case was the same as that in Metcalfe v. Seattle, ante, p. 297, there being but onequestion to be passed upon, however, viz.: Thatwhether the majority required to authorize the officials of a county to issue bonds to build a court-house must be three-fifths of all the voters of the county, or three-fifths of those voting. The action of the court below was the same as that of the superior court of King county, and the judgment here must be the same as in Metcalfe v. Seattle, for the reasons fully given in that case.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to appellee.

Anders, C. J., and Scott, Dunbar and Hoyt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chichester v. Vass
1 Am. Dec. 509 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1797)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 P. 1014, 1 Wash. 305, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-baker-v-snodgrass-wash-1890.