State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann
619 N.E.2d 692, 67 Ohio St. 3d 443
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. The trial court has ordered the relief appellant seeks. If he is dissatisfied, he may appeal. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph three of the syllabus.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann, 619 N.E.2d 692, 67 Ohio St. 3d 443 (Ohio 1993).
619 N.E.2d 692 (State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Steinle v. Dewey
2015 Ohio 3618 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)
State Ex Rel. Cunningham v. Lucci, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)
2006 Ohio 4666 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
State Ex Rel. McDonald v. Mitrovich, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)
2006 Ohio 4665 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
State Ex Rel. Newberry v. O'neill, Unpublished Decision (9-1-2004)
2004 Ohio 4686 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
State v. Russo, Unpublished Decision (12-5-2003)
2003 Ohio 6629 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)
State Ex Rel. Law v. Friedman, Unpublished Decision (11-14-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
State v. Corrigan, Unpublished Decision (2-4-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999