State Ex Rel. Baird v. Schroy
This text of 19 N.E.2d 644 (State Ex Rel. Baird v. Schroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By Section 109 of the amended charter, the people of Akron protected persons holding positions pursuant to appointment from eligible lists and those who had been continuously in the service in the same position for three years preceding the effective date of the amendments. The appellant did not come within either of those requirements, and therefore the judgment of'the Court of Appeals should be, and is, affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 N.E.2d 644, 135 Ohio St. 94, 135 Ohio St. (N.S.) 94, 13 Ohio Op. 442, 1939 Ohio LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-baird-v-schroy-ohio-1939.