State ex rel. Bailey v. Hood

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Bailey v. Hood

592 So. 2d 395, 1992 La. LEXIS 400, 1992 WL 11250

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 10, 1992

DocketNo. 91-KH-2959

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 395 (State ex rel. Bailey v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Bailey v. Hood, 592 So. 2d 395, 1992 La. LEXIS 400, 1992 WL 11250 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Bailey, David Clifton; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 3210-79.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about March 23, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bailey, David Clifton; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 3210-79.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about March 23, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 395, 1992 La. LEXIS 400, 1992 WL 11250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bailey-v-hood-la-1992.