State ex rel. Badock v. McMonagle

826 N.E.2d 312, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1513

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 2005·No. 2005-0231·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On respondents’ answer and motion for summary judgment. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Mover, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Badock v. McMonagle, 826 N.E.2d 312, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1513 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

826 N.E.2d 312 (State ex rel. Badock v. McMonagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.