State Ex Rel. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Wanamaker
This text of 191 N.E. 763 (State Ex Rel. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Wanamaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on to be beard upon tbe demurrer of tbe respondents to tbe relator’s petition, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that said demurrer be, and tbe same hereby is, sustained for tbe reason that tbe writ of prohibition cannot be made to serve tbe purpose of a proceeding in error to correct mistakes of a lower court in deciding questions of law within its jurisdiction. State, ex rel. Barbee, Exr., v. Allen, Probate Judge, 96 Ohio St., 10; State, ex rel. Carmody, v. Justice, Judge, 114 Ohio St., 94, and Silliman v. Court of Common Pleas, 126 Ohio St., 338.
It is therefore ordered and adjudged that tbe petition of tbe relator be, and tbe same hereby is, dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 N.E. 763, 128 Ohio St. 421, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 421, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-b-f-goodrich-co-v-wanamaker-ohio-1934.