State Ex Rel. Axleroad v. Cone

188 So. 93, 137 Fla. 496
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 10, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 188 So. 93 (State Ex Rel. Axleroad v. Cone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Axleroad v. Cone, 188 So. 93, 137 Fla. 496 (Fla. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause is before us on petition for

alternative writ of mandamus' to coerce the Governor of Florida to countersign a warrant drawn by the Comptroller on the State Treasurer to pay to the relator the salary due him by the State of Florida under the provisions of Chapter 13887, Acts of 1929, as amended by Chapter 16997, Acts of 1935, in the sum of $1770.80.

The validity of relator’s claim was tested in mandamus proceedings in this Court, see State, ex rel. Axleroad v. Lee, 132 Fla. 512, 181 Sou. 9, and the Comptroller, as respondent therein, was ordered to draw his warrant, or warrants, for the amount due the relator at the date of institution of that suit.

The Comptroller complied with that order and drew and signed four warrants on the State Treasurer for the sum of $208.33 each and one warrant for $104.16, and presented the same to the Governor to be countersigned under the provision of Section 24, Article IV of the State Constitution. Sec. 135 R. G. S., 165 C. G. L.

The Governor declined to countersign the warrants and this petition in mandamus was filed in this Court.

The validity to the petitioner’s claim, at least to the amount for which the Comptroller was required to draw his warrants and in the amount for which he has' drawn his warrants in compliance with the judgment, supra, has been finally and affirmatively adjudicated.

The Judiciary is without power to direct or coerce the Governor in the exercise of any administrative function. See State v. Drew, 17 Fla. 67.

The Supreme Court may only advise the Governor concerning his duty in regard to his executive powers and duties *498 when requested by him so to do under the provisions of Section 13, Article IV of the Constitution.

So the petition for alternative writ of mandamus must be denied.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman, and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 2009
Willits v. Askew
279 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Kelly v. Curtis
287 A.2d 426 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1972)
State Ex Rel. Pettigrew v. Kirk
243 So. 2d 147 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
Kirk v. Baker
229 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
Florida Industrial Commission v. Neal
224 So. 2d 774 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
State ex rel. Carter v. Florida Industrial Commission
28 Fla. Supp. 143 (Leon County Circuit Court, 1967)
Nelson v. Lindsey
10 So. 2d 131 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 So. 93, 137 Fla. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-axleroad-v-cone-fla-1939.