State ex rel. Atwater v. Gall
This text of 2014 Ohio 3928 (State ex rel. Atwater v. Gall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Atwater v. Gall, 2014-Ohio-3928.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101483
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. JOSEPH ATWATER
RELATOR
vs.
STEVEN E. GALL, JUDGE, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 476119 Order No. 477481
RELEASE DATE: September 9, 2014 FOR RELATOR
Joseph Atwater, pro se R.C.I., No. 420-399 P.O. Box 8107 Mansfield, Ohio 44901
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor BY: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 9th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 MARY J. BOYLE, A.J.:
{¶1} On June 4, 2014, the relator, Joseph Atwater, commenced this procedendo
action to compel a ruling on his motion to merge allied offenses, which he filed on
November 4, 2013, in the underlying case, State v. Atwater, Cuyahoga C.P. No.
CR-01-409121-ZA.1 On June 25, 2014, the respondent moved for summary judgment
on the grounds of mootness. Attached to the respondent’s dispositive motion was a copy
of a certified November 11, 2013 journal entry in which the respondent denied the motion
to merge allied offenses. On July 25, 2014, Atwater filed a brief in opposition.
Atwater argues that the motion for summary judgment is invalid because Judge Timothy
McGinty was the originally assigned judge and presided over the case, and Atwater now
refuses to waive any potential conflict of interest.2 Atwater also argues that the state
received extensions of time to respond to his motion after November 11, 2013; therefore,
the journal entry cannot be binding. Atwater also seeks to cure various filing defects,
such as including a prison cashier’s affidavit and Loc.R. 45 affidavit. Nevertheless, the
November 11, 2013 journal entry establishes that the respondent proceeded to judgment
on the subject motion, and this matter is moot.
1 Atwater named Judge Daniel Gaul as the respondent. However, Judge Steven Gall is the judge assigned to the underlying case. Accordingly, this court substitutes Judge Steven Gall as the respondent.
2 In October 2001, Atwater pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter with a three-year firearm specification and attempted murder. The court imposed a 20-year sentence. Timothy McGinty is now the Cuyahoga County prosecutor. {¶2} Accordingly, this court grants the respondent’s motion for summary
judgment and denies the application for a writ of procedendo. Relator to pay costs.
This court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties notice of this judgment and its
date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).
{¶3} Writ denied.
_____________________________________________ MARY J. BOYLE, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., and SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 3928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-atwater-v-gall-ohioctapp-2014.