State ex rel. Attorney General v. Tontine Insurance

62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 428
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 10, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 428 (State ex rel. Attorney General v. Tontine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Attorney General v. Tontine Insurance, 62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 428 (Ohio 1900).

Opinion

By the Court :

The contracts or bonds delivered by these companies to persons who pay to them the contemplated installments are not contracts of sale in the view of commercial law. In one case the price to be paid is contingent, and in both the payer shares in the operating expenses of the corporation. The companies within the terms of the statute.

Judgment of ouster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-attorney-general-v-tontine-insurance-ohio-1900.