State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Mayor of Belmar

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Mayor of Belmar

41 A. 1116, 60 N.J.L. 240, 31 Vroom 240, 1897 N.J. LEXIS 50

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 15, 1897·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the Supreme Court. This reversal involves only the decision that the act [241]*241of 1890 is unconstitutional. If the act of 1896 is to be pleaded it must be upon application for that purpose to the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Krueger, Nixon. 12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the Supreme Court. This reversal involves only the decision that the act [241]*241of 1890 is unconstitutional. If the act of 1896 is to be pleaded it must be upon application for that purpose to the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Krueger, Nixon. 12.

For reversal—None.

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Mayor of Belmar, 41 A. 1116, 60 N.J.L. 240, 31 Vroom 240, 1897 N.J. LEXIS 50 (N.J. 1897).

Pincite

41 A. 1116 (State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Mayor of Belmar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.