State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Mayor of Belmar

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Mayor of Belmar

41 A. 1116, 60 N.J.L. 240, 31 Vroom 240, 1897 N.J. LEXIS 50

DecidedMarch 15, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A. 1116 (State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Mayor of Belmar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Mayor of Belmar, 41 A. 1116, 60 N.J.L. 240, 31 Vroom 240, 1897 N.J. LEXIS 50 (N.J. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the Supreme Court. This reversal involves only the decision that the act [241]*241of 1890 is unconstitutional. If the act of 1896 is to be pleaded it must be upon application for that purpose to the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Krueger, Nixon. 12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the Supreme Court. This reversal involves only the decision that the act [241]*241of 1890 is unconstitutional. If the act of 1896 is to be pleaded it must be upon application for that purpose to the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Krueger, Nixon. 12.

For reversal—None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A. 1116, 60 N.J.L. 240, 31 Vroom 240, 1897 N.J. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-attorney-general-v-mayor-of-belmar-nj-1897.