State ex rel. Atkins v. Hoover

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Atkins v. Hoover

766 N.E.2d 601, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1425

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 17, 2002

Docket2002-0564

StatusPublished

This text of 766 N.E.2d 601 (State ex rel. Atkins v. Hoover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Atkins v. Hoover, 766 N.E.2d 601, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. No. 20846. On April 8, 2002, appellant filed a notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction. In lieu of the filing fee required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1), appellant tendered a document titled “Affidavit of Indigency.” Whereas appellant’s document is not notarized, it does not meet the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit App. No. 20846. On April 8, 2002, appellant filed a notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction. In lieu of the filing fee required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1), appellant tendered a document titled “Affidavit of Indigency.” Whereas appellant’s document is not notarized, it does not meet the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

766 N.E.2d 601, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-atkins-v-hoover-ohio-2002.