State ex rel. Atkins v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Florida

State ex rel. Atkins v. Anderson

62 So. 2d 43, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1880

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 16, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The real question in this case is whether the lower court abused its discretion in refusing to allow relator to amend her writ to seek relief different from that sought in the original writ after the evidence had been adduced. We have carefully examined the record and do not find that the Chancellor abused his discretion in entering final judgment for the respondent. The final- decree of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

SEBRING, C. J., and THOMAS, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The real question in this case is whether the lower court abused its discretion in refusing to allow relator to amend her writ to seek relief different from that sought in the original writ after the evidence had been adduced. We have carefully examined the record and do not find that the Chancellor abused his discretion in entering final judgment for the respondent. The final- decree of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

SEBRING, C. J., and THOMAS, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur. -

State ex rel. Atkins v. Anderson, 62 So. 2d 43, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1880 (Fla. 1952).

Pincite

62 So. 2d 43 (State ex rel. Atkins v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related