State ex rel. Asarco, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Asarco, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

2001 Ohio 68, 91 Ohio St. 3d 379

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 25, 2001

Docket2000-1252

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 68 (State ex rel. Asarco, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Asarco, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2001 Ohio 68, 91 Ohio St. 3d 379 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 379.]

THE STATE EX REL. ASARCO, INC., APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS- APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Asarco, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-68.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and Industrial Commission’s order reinstated. (No. 00-1252—Submitted February 27, 2001—Decided April 25, 2001.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1247. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn, CO., L.P.A., and Patrick A. Devine, for appellee and cross-appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jacob Dobres, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant and cross-appellee Kenneth A. Poland. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 379.]

THE STATE EX REL. ASARCO, INC., APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS- APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Asarco, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-68.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and Industrial Commission’s order reinstated. (No. 00-1252—Submitted February 27, 2001—Decided April 25, 2001.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1247. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn, CO., L.P.A., and Patrick A. Devine, for appellee and cross-appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jacob Dobres, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant and cross-appellee Kenneth A. Poland. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 68, 91 Ohio St. 3d 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-asarco-inc-v-indus-comm-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack