State Ex Rel. Arnold v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

72 A.2d 700, 195 Md. 700, 1950 Md. LEXIS 311
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 12, 1950
Docket[H.C. No. 33, October Term, 1949.]
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 72 A.2d 700 (State Ex Rel. Arnold v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Arnold v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 72 A.2d 700, 195 Md. 700, 1950 Md. LEXIS 311 (Md. 1950).

Opinion

Grason, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner was tried, convicted and sentenced to the Maryland Penitentiary by the Criminal Court of Baltimore City, upon conviction under two indictments in which he was charged with forgery.

He makes no complaint of his trial, conviction or sentence in these cases. He complains: (1) That he is being kept in solitary confinement, and (2) that he is denied the right to attend church and thus of his right to worship God, by the arbitrary action of the warden. He prays: (1) That a writ of habeas corpus may issue; (2) that a writ of mandamus issue (apparently for the purpose of requiring the warden to permit him to attend church to exercise his right to worship God) and (3) that this court hear the matters raised in his petition and allow him the right to issue for witnesses in his behalf to appear and testify in this Court and permit him the right to appear and conduct his trial in this Court.

If a prisoner serving a sentence in the Maryland Penitentiary is maltreated by the warden or other officials or employees of the institution, his remedy is to apply to the Board of Correction of the State, where his complaint will be heard, and if sustained, corrected. Edmondson v. Warden of Md. House of Correction, 194 Md. 707, 69 A. 2d 919.

*702 There was no basis for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, which was properly refused.

This court is one of appellate jurisdiction and is without jurisdiction to act as a trial court.

Application denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of Assessments
343 A.2d 521 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
State v. McCray
297 A.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1972)
Gray v. Warden
234 A.2d 603 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.2d 700, 195 Md. 700, 1950 Md. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-arnold-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1950.