State ex rel. Arnold v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Arnold v. State

608 So. 2d 157, 1992 La. LEXIS 3519, 1992 WL 339079

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 13, 1992

DocketNo. 92-KH-2896

StatusPublished

This text of 608 So. 2d 157 (State ex rel. Arnold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Arnold v. State, 608 So. 2d 157, 1992 La. LEXIS 3519, 1992 WL 339079 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Arnold, Frank E.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 269-163.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a writ of habeas corpus he has filed on or about August 6, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the writ application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Arnold, Frank E.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 269-163.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a writ of habeas corpus he has filed on or about August 6, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the writ application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

608 So. 2d 157, 1992 La. LEXIS 3519, 1992 WL 339079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-arnold-v-state-la-1992.