State ex rel. Armentrout v. Grant

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Armentrout v. Grant

76 Mo. 95

DecidedOctober 15, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 76 Mo. 95 (State ex rel. Armentrout v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Armentrout v. Grant, 76 Mo. 95 (Mo. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Hough, J.

This is an appeal fiom the judgment of the circuit court of Schuyler county, dismissing the plaintiffs’ suit for the want of prosecution, on the 7th day of November, 1878. The court committed no error in dismissing the suit. The real object of the appeal is to review certain proceedings had in this cause at the April term, 1875, of said court. No exceptions to the action of the court complained of were preserved at the term at which such- action was had, as is. required by section 8636 of the Revised Statutes, and the proceedings then had being on motion and testimony adduced thereon, are not subject to review. No bill of exceptions appears to have been filed in this cause until after the plaintiffs’ suit was dismissed in November, 1878. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hough, J.

This is an appeal fiom the judgment of the circuit court of Schuyler county, dismissing the plaintiffs’ suit for the want of prosecution, on the 7th day of November, 1878. The court committed no error in dismissing the suit. The real object of the appeal is to review certain proceedings had in this cause at the April term, 1875, of said court. No exceptions to the action of the court complained of were preserved at the term at which such- action was had, as is. required by section 8636 of the Revised Statutes, and the proceedings then had being on motion and testimony adduced thereon, are not subject to review. No bill of exceptions appears to have been filed in this cause until after the plaintiffs’ suit was dismissed in November, 1878. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 Mo. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-armentrout-v-grant-mo-1882.