State ex rel. Andrews v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Andrews v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas

766 N.E.2d 996, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1429, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1031

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 23, 2002

Docket2002-0632

StatusPublished

This text of 766 N.E.2d 996 (State ex rel. Andrews v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Andrews v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 766 N.E.2d 996, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1429, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1031 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of relators’ request for a determination before April 23, 2002,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., would deny the motion to expedite and complaint in prohibition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of relators’ request for a determination before April 23, 2002,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., would deny the motion to expedite and complaint in prohibition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

766 N.E.2d 996, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1429, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-andrews-v-summit-cty-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-2002.