State ex rel. Andrews v. Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Andrews v. Board of Elections

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 249

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 1963·No. No. 38387·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As to the third petition paper above referred to, there has not been a substantial compliance with the mandatory requirements of .the statute (Section 3513.261, Revised Code). The motion by respondents to vacate the default judgment heretofore entered is sustained and a writ of mandamus is denied. See State, ex rel. Allen, v. Board of Elections of Lake County, 170 Ohio St., 19; State, ex rel. Ferguson, v. Brown, Secy, of State, 173 Ohio St., 317.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Gibson, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

As to the third petition paper above referred to, there has not been a substantial compliance with the mandatory requirements of .the statute (Section 3513.261, Revised Code). The motion by respondents to vacate the default judgment heretofore entered is sustained and a writ of mandamus is denied. See State, ex rel. Allen, v. Board of Elections of Lake County, 170 Ohio St., 19; State, ex rel. Ferguson, v. Brown, Secy, of State, 173 Ohio St., 317.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Gibson, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., dissents.

State ex rel. Andrews v. Board of Elections, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 249 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 249 (State ex rel. Andrews v. Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.