State Ex Rel. Andreason v. Duncan

150 So. 587, 116 Fla. 193
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 30, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 So. 587 (State Ex Rel. Andreason v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Andreason v. Duncan, 150 So. 587, 116 Fla. 193 (Fla. 1933).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the relator’s demurrer to the return of the respondents to *194 the alternative writ of mandamus herein, and the same having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, and the Court being advised of its opinion in the premises, it seems to the Court that the demurrer to the’return should be visited upon and sustained to the alternative writ of mandamus on the ground that the alternative writ of mandamus commands more than the law requires of the respondent Board of Public Instruction of Jackson County.

■ It is therefore considered and ordered by the Court that the demurrer of the relators interposed to the return of the respondents be and the same is' hereby sustained to the alternative writ of mandamus, with leave to the relators to file an amended alternative writ of mandamus within fifteen days, if they so desire.

Demurrer sustained as to alternative writ of mandamus.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Allen v. Rose
167 So. 21 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 So. 587, 116 Fla. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-andreason-v-duncan-fla-1933.