State ex rel. Anderson v. Descheemaeker

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Anderson v. Descheemaeker

294 P.2d 369, 130 Mont. 612, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 9

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 1, 1956

DocketNo. 9668

StatusPublished

This text of 294 P.2d 369 (State ex rel. Anderson v. Descheemaeker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Anderson v. Descheemaeker, 294 P.2d 369, 130 Mont. 612, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 9 (Mo. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The application of the relators herein, Ludwig Anderson and Margit Anderson for the issuance out of this court of a citation and an order requiring the respondents in this proceeding, August Descheemaeker, Alphonse Croes and George Evertz, to show cause before this court why they should not be punished for contempt for the alleged violation of a decree and judgment given and entered in the district court of Carbon County, wherein relators were plaintiffs and the respondents here were defendants, now pending on appeal in this court, is denied and this proceeding is ordered dismissed.

[613]*613MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR, and MR. JUSTICES ANDERSON, BOTTOMLY and DAVIS, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The application of the relators herein, Ludwig Anderson and Margit Anderson for the issuance out of this court of a citation and an order requiring the respondents in this proceeding, August Descheemaeker, Alphonse Croes and George Evertz, to show cause before this court why they should not be punished for contempt for the alleged violation of a decree and judgment given and entered in the district court of Carbon County, wherein relators were plaintiffs and the respondents here were defendants, now pending on appeal in this court, is denied and this proceeding is ordered dismissed.

[613]*613MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR, and MR. JUSTICES ANDERSON, BOTTOMLY and DAVIS, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 P.2d 369, 130 Mont. 612, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-anderson-v-descheemaeker-mont-1956.