State ex rel. Anderson v. Culotta
This text of 2019 Ohio 1501 (State ex rel. Anderson v. Culotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Anderson v. Culotta, 2019-Ohio-1501.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
STATE OF OHIO ex rel. HERBERT : PER CURIAM OPINION ANDERSON, : Relator, CASE NO. 2018-L-128 : - vs - : VINCENT A. CULOTTA, JUDGE, : Respondent. :
Original Action for Writ of Procedendo.
Judgment: Petition dismissed.
Herbert Anderson, pro se, PID: A572-384, Richland Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 8107, 1001 Olivesburg Road, Mansfield, OH 44905 (Relator).
Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecutor, and Michael DeLeone, Assistant Prosecutor, Lake County Administration Building, 105 Main Street, P.O. Box 490, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Respondent).
PER CURIAM.
{¶1} Relator, Herbert Anderson, has filed a petition for writ of procedendo
against respondent, Judge Vincent A. Culotta. Relator claims he is entitled to the writ
due to respondent’s failure to rule on his “motion to vacate void judgment” in Case No.
09CR000410, filed on June 18, 2018. A review of the docket in Case No. 09CR000410
reveals the trial court ruled on relator’s motion on November 30, 2018. Relator’s petition is therefore dismissed as moot. See e.g. Davis v. Burt, 11th Dist. Geauga No.
2011-G-3009, 2011-Ohio-5340, ¶4.
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J., CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J., MARY JANE TRAPP, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 Ohio 1501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-anderson-v-culotta-ohioctapp-2019.