State ex rel. American District Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Commission

641 S.W.2d 779, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3334
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 7, 1982
DocketNo. WD 32637
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 641 S.W.2d 779 (State ex rel. American District Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. American District Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Commission, 641 S.W.2d 779, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3334 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

TURNAGE, Judge.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company filed an application with the Public Service Commission for authority to restructure its intrastate private line service1 offerings and to change the rates applicable thereto. American District Telegraph intervened because it is a user of a large number of private lines in connection with its security business.

The Commission entered an order on October 11, 1979, allowing Bell an interim increase in rates for the Series 100 service.2 ADT filed a petition for review of the interim rate increase in the Circuit Court in [780]*780which Bell intervened. The Commission’s order was affirmed. This appeal followed.

The record on this appeal, as supplemented, shows that most of the interim 100 series rate increases were made permanent by order of the Commission November 25, 1980, and the remainder of these rate increases were made permanent by a Commission order of December 9, 1981.3

On this appeal ADT challenges the Commission’s order of October 11, 1979, which approved the interim rate increase. In this challenge ADT presents only factual issues related to the interim rate increases. ADT does not contend there is any issue of public importance involved in this appeal which would not be decided by an appellate court if it were not decided in this case.

Because the Commission has granted permanent increases which supersede the interim increase, and the issues presented are factually relevant to the interim increase only, the issues on this appeal are now moot. State ex rel. Missouri Public Service Company v. Fraas, 615 S.W.2d 587, 589 (Mo.App.1981). There are no issues of public importance requiring determination, which would bring this ease within an exception to the mootness doctrine. State ex rel. Gas Service Company v. Public Service Commission, 536 S.W.2d 491, 493 (Mo.App.1976). Thus, the appeal should be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Fischer v. Public Service Commission of Missouri
670 S.W.2d 24 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
641 S.W.2d 779, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-american-district-telegraph-co-v-public-service-commission-moctapp-1982.