State ex rel. Amaro v. Goodman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State ex rel. Amaro v. Goodman

231 So. 2d 271

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1970·No. No. 69-948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court having issued a rule nisi in prohibition herein, and the cause having come on for hearing following the filing of the response and the briefs of the parties, and this court having considered the pleadings and briefs and arguments of counsel, and being of the opinion that no sufficient showing has been made for the issuance of a writ of prohibition, the rule nisi heretofore issued in this cause is discharged and the suggestion in prohibition is dismissed on authority of Hart v. State, 144 Fla. 409, 198 So. 120, 125.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This court having issued a rule nisi in prohibition herein, and the cause having come on for hearing following the filing of the response and the briefs of the parties, and this court having considered the pleadings and briefs and arguments of counsel, and being of the opinion that no sufficient showing has been made for the issuance of a writ of prohibition, the rule nisi heretofore issued in this cause is discharged and the suggestion in prohibition is dismissed on authority of Hart v. State, 144 Fla. 409, 198 So. 120, 125.

It is so ordered.

State ex rel. Amaro v. Goodman, 231 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

231 So. 2d 271 (State ex rel. Amaro v. Goodman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related