State ex rel. Am. Greetings Corp. v. Fuerst

928 N.E.2d 736, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1460
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 23, 2010
Docket2010-0582
StatusPublished

This text of 928 N.E.2d 736 (State ex rel. Am. Greetings Corp. v. Fuerst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Am. Greetings Corp. v. Fuerst, 928 N.E.2d 736, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. Motion of Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103 I.B.E.W. to intervene as respondent is granted. Motions to dismiss are denied. Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.6:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after filing of respondent’s brief.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
928 N.E.2d 736, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-am-greetings-corp-v-fuerst-ohio-2010.