State ex rel. Allison v. Jones

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 323
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 1960·No. No. 36369·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

With, the exception of the identities of the ' relator and appointee-respondent, the facts and questions of * law in this case are identically the same as those in the case of State, ex rel. Devine, Pros. Atty., v. Hoermle, 168 Ohio St., 461. Therefore, under the doctrine of stare decisis, the demurrer to the answer is sustained and the judgment of ouster prayed for is rendered upon authority of that case.

Demurrer sustained and judgment of ouster.

Taft, Matthias, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman and Bell, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in the Hoermle case, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Allison v. Jones, 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 323 (Ohio 1960).

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 323 (State ex rel. Allison v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballard County v. Kentucky County Debt Commission
162 S.W.2d 771 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1942)