State ex rel. Allison v. Jones

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 323
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1960
DocketNo. 36369
StatusPublished

This text of 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 323 (State ex rel. Allison v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Allison v. Jones, 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 323 (Ohio 1960).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

With, the exception of the identities of the ' relator and appointee-respondent, the facts and questions of * law in this case are identically the same as those in the case of State, ex rel. Devine, Pros. Atty., v. Hoermle, 168 Ohio St., 461. Therefore, under the doctrine of stare decisis, the demurrer to the answer is sustained and the judgment of ouster prayed for is rendered upon authority of that case.

Demurrer sustained and judgment of ouster.

Taft, Matthias, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman and Bell, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in the Hoermle case, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ballard County v. Kentucky County Debt Commission
162 S.W.2d 771 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-allison-v-jones-ohio-1960.