State ex rel. Allen v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections

872 N.E.2d 292, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1498
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 17, 2007
Docket2007-1291
StatusPublished

This text of 872 N.E.2d 292 (State ex rel. Allen v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Allen v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections, 872 N.E.2d 292, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1498 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s request for expedited review,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

It is further ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

Relators shall file his brief and evidence within seven days of the date of this entry, respondents shall file their brief and evidence within seven days after the filing of relator’s brief and relator may file a reply brief within three days after filing of respondents’ brief.

It is further ordered that service of documents shall be personal or by facsimile transmission as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2)(B)(3).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
872 N.E.2d 292, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-allen-v-warren-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2007.