State Ex Rel. Allen v. Rose

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Allen v. Rose

173 So. 345, 127 Fla. 494, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1477

DecidedMarch 22, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 173 So. 345 (State Ex Rel. Allen v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Allen v. Rose, 173 So. 345, 127 Fla. 494, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1477 (Fla. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on motion of relator for substitution of parties respondent and suggestion for entry of final judgment, and the same being considered by the Court, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the respondent members of the State Racing Commis *495 sion, Carl G. Rose, W. H. Donovan, T. A. Johnson, R. R. Saunders and Roger H. West who have become separated from their office, be substituted by Joseph R. Stein, Parks Glover; E. A. Williams, Frank J. Rogers and Samuel J. Hilburn, their respective successors. And it further appearing that on December 14, 1936, this Court entered an order quashing the second amended alternative writ of mandamus and it appears from the record that no further alternative writ has been filed the cause is therefore dismissed from this Court.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford- and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on motion of relator for substitution of parties respondent and suggestion for entry of final judgment, and the same being considered by the Court, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the respondent members of the State Racing Commis *495 sion, Carl G. Rose, W. H. Donovan, T. A. Johnson, R. R. Saunders and Roger H. West who have become separated from their office, be substituted by Joseph R. Stein, Parks Glover; E. A. Williams, Frank J. Rogers and Samuel J. Hilburn, their respective successors. And it further appearing that on December 14, 1936, this Court entered an order quashing the second amended alternative writ of mandamus and it appears from the record that no further alternative writ has been filed the cause is therefore dismissed from this Court.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford- and Davis, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 So. 345, 127 Fla. 494, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-allen-v-rose-fla-1937.