State ex rel. Alexian Bros. Hospital v. Powers

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Alexian Bros. Hospital v. Powers

74 Mo. 476

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedOctober 15, 1881

StatusPublished

Cited by19 cases

This text of 74 Mo. 476 (State ex rel. Alexian Bros. Hospital v. Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Alexian Bros. Hospital v. Powers, 74 Mo. 476 (Mo. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Henry, J.

This was a proceeding in the nature of a mandamus to compel the city assessor to strike from the list of taxable property one acre of land and improvements thereon in the city of St. Louis, owned by relator, on the ground that it is “ exclusively * * for purposes purely charitable, and is, therefore, not subject to taxation.” A full statement of the case will be found in 10 Mo. App. 263. The judgment of the circuit court was for relator. On appeal to the court of appeals, that judgment was affirmed, and the city assessor has appealed to this [477]*477court. A careful examination of the opinion delivered in this cause by tbe court of appeals, and of the authorities cited, has satisfied us with tbe argument and conclusions of that court, and its judgment is affirmed.

Hough and Ray, JJ.. concur. Sherwood, O. J., and Norton, J.. dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry, J.

This was a proceeding in the nature of a mandamus to compel the city assessor to strike from the list of taxable property one acre of land and improvements thereon in the city of St. Louis, owned by relator, on the ground that it is “ exclusively * * for purposes purely charitable, and is, therefore, not subject to taxation.” A full statement of the case will be found in 10 Mo. App. 263. The judgment of the circuit court was for relator. On appeal to the court of appeals, that judgment was affirmed, and the city assessor has appealed to this [477]*477court. A careful examination of the opinion delivered in this cause by tbe court of appeals, and of the authorities cited, has satisfied us with tbe argument and conclusions of that court, and its judgment is affirmed.

Hough and Ray, JJ.. concur. Sherwood, O. J., and Norton, J.. dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 Mo. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-alexian-bros-hospital-v-powers-mo-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack