State ex rel. Alexander v. State

71 So. 3d 269, 2011 La. LEXIS 2275, 2011 WL 4644912
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 30, 2011·No. No. 2011-KH-1431·Published

Opinion

In re Alexander, Brandon; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 10-239080; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 11-00738.

Granted for the sole purpose of remanding the case to the district court and or[270]*270dering it to rule on the merits of relator’s pro se motions. See State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La.9/22/95), 660 So.2d 466, 467 (“[L]ower courts must ... accept and consider [pro se] filings from represented defendants in a pre-verdict context whenever doing so will not lead to confusion at trial”).

VICTORY, KNOLL and CLARK, JJ., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Alexander v. State, 71 So. 3d 269, 2011 La. LEXIS 2275, 2011 WL 4644912 (La. 2011).

71 So. 3d 269 (State ex rel. Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Melon
660 So. 2d 466 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)