State Ex Rel. Alexander v. Pharr

103 S.E. 8, 179 N.C. 699, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 330
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 5, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 8 (State Ex Rel. Alexander v. Pharr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Alexander v. Pharr, 103 S.E. 8, 179 N.C. 699, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 330 (N.C. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This Court is without jurisdiction, because the action is to try the title to a seat in the General Assembly of North Carolina, and the Constitution of the State (Art. II, sec. 22) provides “Each House (of the General Assembly) shall be judge of the qualifications and elections of its own members,” thereby withdrawing the inquiry from the consideration of the courts.

This is the construction given to a similar section of the Constitution of the United States in Britt v. Board of Canvassers, 172 N. C., 797.

Affirmed.

Clare, C. J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

N.C. State Conf. of NAACP v. Moore
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2022
NC NAACP v. Moore
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2022
Daniel v. Bound
1938 OK 650 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Lessard v. Snell
63 P.2d 893 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1937)
Anderson v. Blackwell, SEC. of State
167 S.E. 30 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1933)
State Ex Rel. Bouldin v. Davis
150 S.E. 507 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
Britt v. . Board of Canvassers
90 S.E. 1005 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 8, 179 N.C. 699, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-alexander-v-pharr-nc-1920.