State ex rel. Alexander v. Ouachita Parish, Fourth Judicial District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Alexander v. Ouachita Parish, Fourth Judicial District Court

558 So. 2d 609, 1990 La. LEXIS 850, 1990 WL 39051

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 4, 1990

DocketNo. 90-KH-0562

StatusPublished

This text of 558 So. 2d 609 (State ex rel. Alexander v. Ouachita Parish, Fourth Judicial District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Alexander v. Ouachita Parish, Fourth Judicial District Court, 558 So. 2d 609, 1990 La. LEXIS 850, 1990 WL 39051 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Alexander, Marvin G.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Oua-chita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 38117.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Alexander, Marvin G.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Oua-chita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 38117.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

558 So. 2d 609, 1990 La. LEXIS 850, 1990 WL 39051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-alexander-v-ouachita-parish-fourth-judicial-district-court-la-1990.