State ex rel. Alexander v. Landis

Supreme Court of Florida

State ex rel. Alexander v. Landis

50 Fla. 283

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 15, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 Fla. 283 (State ex rel. Alexander v. Landis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Alexander v. Landis, 50 Fla. 283 (Fla. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the Secretary of the County Democratic Executive Committee to furnish relator a copy of the poll list at Election District No. 2 in Volusia county at the primary election held May 10, 1904. A motion to quash the alternative writ was filed, setting forth among other grounds the failure of said writ to negative other adequate remedy. Upon the hearing of this motion the following order was made: “Motion is granted and the relator is allowed to amend his writ and petition as he may be advised.” No further or other order appears in the transcript, and the writ of error mentions specifically this [284]*284order and none other. Such an order is interlocutory and will not support a writ of error. Gates v. Hayner, 22 Fla. 325.

The writ is dismissed.

Shackleford, C. J., Cockrell and Whitfield, JJ., concur. Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.

wfflwsewswtRWWJA»/»*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the Secretary of the County Democratic Executive Committee to furnish relator a copy of the poll list at Election District No. 2 in Volusia county at the primary election held May 10, 1904. A motion to quash the alternative writ was filed, setting forth among other grounds the failure of said writ to negative other adequate remedy. Upon the hearing of this motion the following order was made: “Motion is granted and the relator is allowed to amend his writ and petition as he may be advised.” No further or other order appears in the transcript, and the writ of error mentions specifically this [284]*284order and none other. Such an order is interlocutory and will not support a writ of error. Gates v. Hayner, 22 Fla. 325.

The writ is dismissed.

Shackleford, C. J., Cockrell and Whitfield, JJ., concur. Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.

wfflwsewswtRWWJA»/»*

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Fla. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-alexander-v-landis-fla-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack