State Ex Rel. Albritton v. Lee

183 So. 782, 134 Fla. 59
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 15, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 183 So. 782 (State Ex Rel. Albritton v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Albritton v. Lee, 183 So. 782, 134 Fla. 59 (Fla. 1938).

Opinions

The above styled cause is at issue before the Court upon motion of Counsel for Respondent to quash the Alternative Writ of Mandamus issued in the cause. Mr. Chief Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the said motion to quash the alternative writ should be denied; while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that said motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus in this cause, be and it is hereby denied.

ELLIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Stewart
161 So. 3d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 782, 134 Fla. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-albritton-v-lee-fla-1938.