State ex rel. Aker v. Kizer

Indiana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Aker v. Kizer

6 Blackf. 44

DecidedNovember 15, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Blackf. 44 (State ex rel. Aker v. Kizer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Aker v. Kizer, 6 Blackf. 44 (Ind. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

AN action of debt was brought by the State, on the relation of Aker, on a bond for the payment of money. The bond shown on oyer was conditioned that a certain collector should faithfully discharge his duties, &c. Held, on demurrer, that the declaration was not objectionable for not setting out the condition and breaches. Evans et al. v. The State, 2 Blackf., 387. Held, also, that the declaration not setting out the condition, &c., need not show that the relator was beneficially interested in the suit. The State, ex rel. Naylor et. al. v. Harding et al., May term, 1841.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AN action of debt was brought by the State, on the relation of Aker, on a bond for the payment of money. The bond shown on oyer was conditioned that a certain collector should faithfully discharge his duties, &c. Held, on demurrer, that the declaration was not objectionable for not setting out the condition and breaches. Evans et al. v. The State, 2 Blackf., 387. Held, also, that the declaration not setting out the condition, &c., need not show that the relator was beneficially interested in the suit. The State, ex rel. Naylor et. al. v. Harding et al., May term, 1841.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Blackf. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-aker-v-kizer-ind-1841.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack