State ex rel. AK Steel Corp. v. Jones
This text of 764 N.E.2d 440 (State ex rel. AK Steel Corp. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated upon the filing of a complaint in mandamus and prohibition on February 8, 2002. The relator accompanied its complaint with a memorandum in support of the writ as permitted by S.Ct.Prac.R. X(4).
On February 28, 2002, amici curiae, Ohio Manufacturers’ Association et al., filed a motion for leave to file a memorandum in support of the writ. Wfiiereas the Rules of Practice do not provide for the filing of a memorandum in support of the writ by an amicus curiae and whereas the request for leave to file was filed after the time allowed to the relator for filing a memorandum in support of the writ [1496]*1496had passed,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file an amici curiae memorandum in support of the writ be, and hereby is, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
764 N.E.2d 440, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1495, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ak-steel-corp-v-jones-ohio-2002.