State ex rel. Aitken v. Rightor

43 La. Ann. 380
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 15, 1891·No. No. 10,825·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

This is an application for a certiorari. The complaint is that the District Judge has, while reviewing a judgment on appeal from a city court, admitted oral testimony, when written evidence only should have been received.

Under Article 90 of the Oonstitution, the jurisdiction of this court [381] does not extend over inferior courts, so as to review questions of this character, which can only be considered' when properly prosecuted on appeal from the judgment on the merits, which does not lie in this case.

Application refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Aitken v. Rightor, 43 La. Ann. 380 (La. 1891).

43 La. Ann. 380 (State ex rel. Aitken v. Rightor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liuzza v. Simms
97 So. 470 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)