State Ex Rel. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. District Court
This text of 290 P. 1121 (State Ex Rel. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for a writ of mandate herein is denied. Conceding that the amended answer does not present any new issue, that the affirmative defense is no better, and that the counterclaim is unwarranted, all of which appears probable, though not now decided, the district court has jurisdiction of the cause in which the order complained of was made, and upon the facts presented we cannot say it has not the jurisdiction to make it. Therefore it had the power to decide wrong as well as right, and its discretion cannot be controlled by mandamus.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
290 P. 1121, 86 Mont. 616, 1930 Mont. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-advance-rumely-thresher-co-v-district-court-mont-1930.