State ex rel. A. B. M.

309 A.2d 617, 63 N.J. 531, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 208
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 25, 1973·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. State of New Jersey in Interest of A. B. M., 125 N. J. Super. 162 (App. Div. 1972).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Garven and Justices Jacobs, Hall, Sullivan, P ashman and Clifford — 6.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. A. B. M., 309 A.2d 617, 63 N.J. 531, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 208 (N.J. 1973).

309 A.2d 617 (State ex rel. A. B. M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Presha
748 A.2d 1108 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)
State ex rel. O.F.
742 A.2d 971 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
State in Interest of ABM
309 A.2d 617 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)