State ex rel. A. A. Lane Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission

125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 23, 1932
DocketNo. 23288
StatusPublished

This text of 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96 (State ex rel. A. A. Lane Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. A. A. Lane Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96 (Ohio 1932).

Opinions

By the Court.

It is ordered and adjudged that the writ of mandamus prayed for be, and the same hereby is, denied, for the reason that the respondent has no right to institute an action against the employer for the collection of the penalty imposed for the violation of a specific requirement prior to the payment by the respondent of such penalty to the injured party, and the respondent has not heretofore made such payment by reason of the fact that the respondent has been enjoined by the trial court, the appellate court, and by this court, from making such payment.

Writ denied.

Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Marshall, C. J., dissents. Stephenson, J., not participating.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slatmeyer v. Industrial Commission
155 N.E. 484 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1926)
Buckeye Churn Co. v. Abbott.
152 N.E. 391 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-a-a-lane-construction-co-v-industrial-commission-ohio-1932.