State Division of Human Rights v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.

52 A.D.2d 1088, 384 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13026, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1815
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 28, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 1088 (State Division of Human Rights v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Division of Human Rights v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp., 52 A.D.2d 1088, 384 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13026, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Determinations of State Human Rights Appeal Board and of State division unanimously confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In September, 1972 petitioner filed a complaint with the State Division of Human Rights alleging unlawful discrimination in hiring because of age. The division conducted an investigation and dismissed the complaint on February 1, 1973. Petitioner appealed to the State Human Rights Appeal Board and the case was remanded to the division for further proceedings. In September, 1973 petitioner filed a second complaint charging unlawful discrimination in hiring, grounded upon the allegation that respondent did not assign him to a position because he had filed the initial complaint. The division consolidated the complaints and held a hearing which resulted in their dismissal. The division’s action was subsequently affirmed by the board. This court must consider the findings of fact on which the board’s order is based to be conclusive "if supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole” (Executive Law, § 298). An extensive hearing was held in this matter and it was found that there was insufficient evidence upon which to conclude either that petitioner’s employment was terminated because of his age or that he was denied consideration for further employment in retaliation for having filed the first complaint. Our review and consideration of the record confirms that the board’s order is based upon adequate evidentiary support. The record is devoid of proof of unlawful discrimination. (Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Mahoney and Dillon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pixley v. Raymond Corp.
59 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Heron v. Albany Law School of Union University
57 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.2d 1088, 384 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13026, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-stone-webster-engineering-corp-nyappdiv-1976.