State Division of Human Rights v. St. Elizabeth's Hospital

105 A.D.2d 1063, 482 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21139

This text of 105 A.D.2d 1063 (State Division of Human Rights v. St. Elizabeth's Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Division of Human Rights v. St. Elizabeth's Hospital, 105 A.D.2d 1063, 482 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Cross motion for order of enforcement granted. Memorandum: On this record we do not find that the delay was so egregious as to constitute prejudice as a matter of law (Matter of Sarkisian Bros. v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816, 818). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sarkisian Bros. v. State Division of Human Rights
399 N.E.2d 1146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A.D.2d 1063, 482 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-st-elizabeths-hospital-nyappdiv-1984.