State Division of Human Rights v. Pomeranc
This text of 60 A.D.2d 972 (State Division of Human Rights v. Pomeranc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Determination unanimously confirmed, with costs, petition dismissed and cross motion for order of enforcement granted. Memorandum: The findings of fact are supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole and are conclusive upon this court (Executive Law, § 298; City of Schenectady v State Div. of Human Rights, 37 NY2d 421, 424). The ordering paragraphs are proper and entitled to be enforced on the division’s cross motion seeking an order of enforcement (Batavia Lodge No. 196, Loyal Order of Moose v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 35 NY2d 143; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Gillotte, 41 AD2d 890; Matter of Moskal v State of New York, 36 AD2d 46, 49). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Hancock, Jr., and Denman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.2d 972, 401 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-pomeranc-nyappdiv-1978.