Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/State Division of Human Rights v. Kerpoe, Testa & O'Donnell, Inc.

State Division of Human Rights v. Kerpoe, Testa & O'Donnell, Inc.

34 A.D.2d 1111, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 2, 1970
StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 1111 (State Division of Human Rights v. Kerpoe, Testa & O'Donnell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Division of Human Rights v. Kerpoe, Testa & O'Donnell, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 1111, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Application denied, without prejudice to the right of petitioner to renew upon proof of noncompliance with the order of the Commissioner and other facts showing the necessity for the enforcement of said order. (Executive Law, § 297 subd. 7; § 298, and see Matter of State Division of Human Rights, v. Employers-Commercial Union Ins. Group, 33 A D 2d 273.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.D.2d 1111, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-kerpoe-testa-odonnell-inc-nyappdiv-1970.