State Division of Human Rights v. Hajithemelis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Division of Human Rights v. Hajithemelis

40 A.D.2d 1000, 338 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3058

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 1000 (State Division of Human Rights v. Hajithemelis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Division of Human Rights v. Hajithemelis, 40 A.D.2d 1000, 338 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Renewed proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to enforce an order of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights, dated April 21, 1972, and to compel respondents to comply with the order. Petition granted, without costs, to the extent that respondents are directed to comply with said order as modified, herein. The order is modified, on the law, (1) by striking from subdivision b of the second decretal paragraph thereof the following: “ and its designee, Operation Open City, 1059 Nostrand Avenue, Brooklyn, New York,” and (2) by striking therefrom subdivision e of the second decretal paragraph in its entirety. (See the opinion of this court in Kaval Constr. Corp. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 39 A D 2d 347, and cases cited therein.) Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Renewed proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to enforce an order of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights, dated April 21, 1972, and to compel respondents to comply with the order. Petition granted, without costs, to the extent that respondents are directed to comply with said order as modified, herein. The order is modified, on the law, (1) by striking from subdivision b of the second decretal paragraph thereof the following: “ and its designee, Operation Open City, 1059 Nostrand Avenue, Brooklyn, New York,” and (2) by striking therefrom subdivision e of the second decretal paragraph in its entirety. (See the opinion of this court in Kaval Constr. Corp. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 39 A D 2d 347, and cases cited therein.) Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 1000, 338 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-hajithemelis-nyappdiv-1972.