State Division of Human Rights v. Goodwill Industries
521 N.E.2d 442, 70 N.Y.2d 1001, 526 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 155
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Court of Appeals Rules of Practice.
Judge Titone taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Division of Human Rights v. Goodwill Industries, 521 N.E.2d 442, 70 N.Y.2d 1001, 526 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 155 (N.Y. 1988).
521 N.E.2d 442 (State Division of Human Rights v. Goodwill Industries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Northern Orchard Co. v. State Division of Human Rights
161 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Dempsey v. City of Troy
146 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)