State Division of Human Rights v. Decker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Division of Human Rights v. Decker

40 A.D.2d 548, 334 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 548 (State Division of Human Rights v. Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Division of Human Rights v. Decker, 40 A.D.2d 548, 334 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under section 298 of the Executive Law to enforce petitioner’s order dated February 17, 1972. Petition granted, with costs to petitioner, State Division of Human Rights, to be taxed by the County Clerk of Orange County under CPLR 8203, 8301; respondents are directed to comply with the order of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights dated February 17, 1972. Although respondents did not appeal to the Human Rights Appeal Board and have not appeared in opposition, to the instant proceeding, we have examined the merits of the order to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence (Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Bystricky, 30 N Y 2d 322; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Fairway Apts. Corp., 39 A D 2d 761). In our opinion, the findings of discrimination and the $580 award are clearly supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole (Executive Law, § 298). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under section 298 of the Executive Law to enforce petitioner’s order dated February 17, 1972. Petition granted, with costs to petitioner, State Division of Human Rights, to be taxed by the County Clerk of Orange County under CPLR 8203, 8301; respondents are directed to comply with the order of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights dated February 17, 1972. Although respondents did not appeal to the Human Rights Appeal Board and have not appeared in opposition, to the instant proceeding, we have examined the merits of the order to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence (Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Bystricky, 30 N Y 2d 322; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Fairway Apts. Corp., 39 A D 2d 761). In our opinion, the findings of discrimination and the $580 award are clearly supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole (Executive Law, § 298). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 548, 334 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-decker-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack