State Division of Human Rights v. Buffalo Columbus Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Division of Human Rights v. Buffalo Columbus Hospital

116 A.D.2d 1013, 498 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51794

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298, petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights that there is no probable cause to believe that respondent unlawfully discriminated against her in employment on account of disability and sex. She contends that the investigation conducted by the Division was inadequate to support the determination. We disagree.

The investigation included interviews with petitioner and other employees at respondent’s facility, as well as a review of personnel records, correspondence and other pertinent documents. The determination that there is no probable cause for petitioner’s complaint has a rational basis in the record and is thus not arbitrary or capricious (State Div. of Human Rights v County of Erie, 107 AD2d 1042; State Div. of Human Rights v Stanmor Liq. Co., 107 AD2d 1056). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298, petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights that there is no probable cause to believe that respondent unlawfully discriminated against her in employment on account of disability and sex. She contends that the investigation conducted by the Division was inadequate to support the determination. We disagree.

The investigation included interviews with petitioner and other employees at respondent’s facility, as well as a review of personnel records, correspondence and other pertinent documents. The determination that there is no probable cause for petitioner’s complaint has a rational basis in the record and is thus not arbitrary or capricious (State Div. of Human Rights v County of Erie, 107 AD2d 1042; State Div. of Human Rights v Stanmor Liq. Co., 107 AD2d 1056). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

State Division of Human Rights v. Buffalo Columbus Hospital, 116 A.D.2d 1013, 498 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

116 A.D.2d 1013 (State Division of Human Rights v. Buffalo Columbus Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related