State Division of Human Rights v. Bonny May Beauty Salons
This text of 71 A.D.2d 811 (State Division of Human Rights v. Bonny May Beauty Salons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
nation unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding instituted pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law, petitioner seeks review of an order of the Human Rights Appeal Board affirming a determination of the State Division of Human Rights. After a hearing, the division found that petitioner had discriminated against respondent on the basis of sex by refusing to consider him for employment and, inter alia, ordered petitioner to pay respondent an amount based on [812]*812what he would have earned had petitioner hired him for the period from the date of petitioner’s refusal to hire him to the date he obtained other employment. We find that substantial evidence supported the agency’s determination (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181; State Div. of Human Rights v Irish Farms, 71 AD2d 828). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 A.D.2d 811, 419 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-bonny-may-beauty-salons-nyappdiv-1979.