State Division of Human Rights v. Berkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Division of Human Rights v. Berkowitz

40 A.D.2d 942, 337 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3543

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 942 (State Division of Human Rights v. Berkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Division of Human Rights v. Berkowitz, 40 A.D.2d 942, 337 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Application unanimously granted as modified, without costs. Memorandum: In this application by the State Division of Human Rights for an order of enforcement under section 298 of the Executive Law of its order of November 30, 1970 directed to respondent, it appears that respondent has made the payment of compensatory damages awarded to complainant but has failed to comply with the order in other respects. The Division has consented to the deletion of the last sentence (that is, the second sentence) in the paragraph designated “a” in the order and as so modified respondent agrees to comply with the order. The Division is entitled to the order of this court upon its order as thus modified. (Proceeding pursuant to section 298 Executive Law to modify and enforce order of Commissioner of Human Rights.) Present— Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application unanimously granted as modified, without costs. Memorandum: In this application by the State Division of Human Rights for an order of enforcement under section 298 of the Executive Law of its order of November 30, 1970 directed to respondent, it appears that respondent has made the payment of compensatory damages awarded to complainant but has failed to comply with the order in other respects. The Division has consented to the deletion of the last sentence (that is, the second sentence) in the paragraph designated “a” in the order and as so modified respondent agrees to comply with the order. The Division is entitled to the order of this court upon its order as thus modified. (Proceeding pursuant to section 298 Executive Law to modify and enforce order of Commissioner of Human Rights.) Present— Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 942, 337 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-division-of-human-rights-v-berkowitz-nyappdiv-1972.