STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
This text of 250 A.2d 11 (STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Subsequent to the entry of the orders appealed from, the defendant brought itself into sufficient compliance. Despite this, the plaintiff presses its contention that the orders were valid when made and were properly upheld in the Appellate Division, and that the defendant's appeal should therefore now be rejected. We agree and affirm for the reasons expressed by Judge Goldmann in his comprehensive opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 100 N. J. Super. 366 (App. Div. 1968).
Affirmed.
*250 For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintkaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall and Schettino — 5.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.2d 11, 53 N.J. 248, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-dept-of-health-v-owens-corning-fiberglas-corp-nj-1969.